Your AI Act practice has the engagements.
We deliver the platform.
If your firm has signed SOWs to advise clients on EU AI Act compliance, you have a fulfillment problem coming due August 2, 2026. We are the implementation backbone you need to deliver the technical scope without building it yourself.
Your clients will not accept a binder of recommendations. They need an audit-ready system, by August 2, that survives a regulator's review. That is the engineering work your firm is not staffed to deliver, and the work we already do.
Your AI/Technology practice is one of the fastest-growing groups inside the firm right now, and the partners running it have a problem the firm has not seen before: the deliverable is half legal, half technical. The legal advisory part you do well. The technical implementation (system inventory, risk classification, conformity assessment evidence, the runtime audit trail, the documentation package the assessor will demand) is engineering work, on a deadline your clients consider personal, with consequences that show up in your firm's reputation if it slips.
Most firms are now resolving this in one of two ways. Either they staff up junior associates to assemble what they can with off-the-shelf tools (slow, expensive, and the result still does not satisfy the conformity assessor), or they partner with a technology provider who delivers the implementation under the firm's brand. The second path is faster, cheaper for the firm, and substantially better for the client.
The four arguments for partnering now
Pre-sold demand, on a deadline
Your SOWs are signed. Your clients are paying. The August 2 deadline is fixed. The implementation has to happen. The only question is whether you build it, partner for it, or watch the engagement underdeliver.
Technical scope without the capex
A realtime decision layer with citation-backed verdicts and a regulator-grade audit log is a multi-year engineering investment. Partnership lets you ship that capability inside a single engagement, with no platform team to hire.
Firm-priced, partner-delivered
You set the engagement price. You own the relationship. We are the sub-contractor that makes the technical half of the SOW deliverable. The client experiences one program from your firm.
Reputation insurance
Engagements that miss the August 2 deadline become referenceable for the wrong reason. The fastest way to ensure your AI Act practice graduates a strong cohort of clients in 2026 is to back it with infrastructure that already works.
How the partnership works
Discovery call (30 minutes)
We map your active AI Act engagements, the technical scope you have committed to, and where the implementation gap is. No legal advice on our part, no platform pitch on yours. Pure scoping.
Engagement structuring
We agree on the partnership shape: white-label sub-contract, named technology partner, or per-engagement referral. Your firm's positioning drives the choice. The economics flex to fit it.
First engagement together
You bring an active client. We deliver the technical implementation alongside your legal advisory. Your team learns the platform on the actual work. The client gets a single, coherent program.
Repeatable for the rest of your book
Once the first engagement is shipping, the same pattern applies to every active SOW. Your AI Act practice scales without your firm having to build a platform team.
Who this is for
The firms we partner with most successfully share a profile.
- ✓
Mid-tier (50-500 attorneys) with an established EU AI Act, digital regulation, or technology advisory practice.
- ✓
Three or more active enterprise EU AI Act engagements with August 2026 deliverables.
- ✓
EU presence (Brussels, Frankfurt, Paris, Amsterdam, or Dublin) or a serious EU client base served from elsewhere.
- ✓
No in-house technical compliance platform, and no plans to build one in 2026.
- ✓
A named partner running the AI/Technology practice group who can sign off on a partnership without convening a procurement committee.
Frequently asked questions
How does the partnership work?
Your firm owns the client relationship, the SOW, and the legal advisory work. We deliver the technical compliance platform that fulfills the implementation half of your engagement. The client experiences one program from your firm; we are the engine underneath.
Why partner instead of building this internally?
Building a realtime decision and audit-trail platform is a multi-year engineering investment that does not fit a law firm's economics or operating model. Partnership lets you fulfill the technical scope your SOWs already promised, on a timeline your clients are demanding, without the capex.
What does Navedas deliver in a typical engagement?
The full technical implementation: AI system inventory, risk classification, conformity assessment evidence, the audit-ready decision log, the runtime policy layer, and the documentation package the conformity assessor will request. All under your firm's brand if you want it that way.
What firms are the best fit?
Mid-tier firms (50-500 attorneys) with an established EU AI Act, digital regulation, or technology advisory practice and three or more active enterprise compliance engagements. Brussels presence is a strong signal. The fit conversation is fastest with the partner leading the AI/Technology practice group.
Is this a referral arrangement or something deeper?
It can be either. The most common structure is white-label: your firm prices and delivers the engagement, we are the technical sub-contractor. We can also operate as a named technology partner where the client sees both brands. The right structure depends on your firm's positioning.
Open a partnership conversation.
Thirty minutes. No NDA, no pitch deck, just a candid scoping call about your active engagements and where the technical implementation gap is. The partner running your AI/Technology practice is the right person to start.